Reverberation Time: Why a Room Sounds Harsh or Comfortable

Reverberation time is how long a sound takes to decay by 60 decibels after its source stops, commonly written RT60. It is governed by room volume and the amount of absorption in the room, so a large hard-finished space rings and the same space with absorbent surfaces sounds controlled.

By Dhruv Agarwal · · 2 min read

Why it matters on a project

Acoustic complaints are the most common post-occupancy complaint in offices, and the most expensive to fix afterwards, because the remedy means adding surfaces to a finished, occupied space.

The frustrating part is that reverberation is entirely predictable at design stage. It is arithmetic — volume and absorption — not a matter of taste.

What you can change

ElementAbsorbent?Notes
Suspended mineral fibre ceilingYesUsually the biggest single contribution
Exposed concrete soffitNoFashionable, and acoustically the worst choice
CarpetYesAlso reduces footfall noise
Hard flooringNoReflects speech and footfall
Glazed partitionsNoReflective on both sides
Solid walls, paintedNoUnless treated
Acoustic wall panelsYesEffective where surfaces face each other
Soft furnishing and peopleYesReal, but not something to design around

The pattern behind most bad offices

Three decisions taken separately, each defensible, and together the problem:

  1. Exposed soffit for height and an industrial look — removes the ceiling.
  2. Glazed partitions for daylight — replaces absorbent walls with glass.
  3. Hard flooring for durability and appearance — removes the floor.

Every absorbent surface in the room has now been specified away. The space looks excellent in photographs and is tiring to occupy.

If those choices are wanted, the absorption has to be reintroduced deliberately — acoustic rafts or baffles under the soffit, absorbent wall panels, or carpet in the working zones.

Measurement and prediction

Reverberation time is measured in finished rooms under ISO 3382-2, and the absorption data for materials comes from tests under ISO 354. For open-plan offices, ISO 3382-3 addresses the measures that describe that condition better — how far speech remains intelligible across the floor.

Because it can be calculated from volume and surface absorption, the check belongs at design stage, when the fix is a specification change.

Common mistakes

  • Specifying an exposed soffit with no compensating absorption. The single most common cause.
  • Treating acoustics as something to assess after occupation. By then the remedy is disruptive and visible.
  • Assuming glazed partitions solve meeting room acoustics. They control transmission between rooms, not reverberation within them.
  • Adding panels to the wrong surfaces. Absorption works where reflections actually occur, usually the ceiling first.
  • Ignoring the floor. In an open plan it is often the largest available absorbent area.

Standards referenced

Reverberation time measurement to ISO 3382-2; sound absorption measurement to ISO 354; open-plan office acoustics in ISO 3382-3. Target values and acoustic design for a specific space must be established by the project's acoustic consultant.

Standards referenced

  • ISO 3382-2 — Acoustics — measurement of reverberation time in ordinary rooms (ISO)
  • ISO 354 — Acoustics — measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room (ISO)
  • ISO 3382-3 — Acoustics — open plan offices (ISO)

Frequently asked

Two things: the volume of the room and the total absorption in it. Bigger volume means longer reverberation; more absorption means shorter. Since you cannot usually change the volume of a completed floor, absorption is effectively the only lever — which is why ceiling, floor finish and wall treatment carry the whole burden.

Because the fashionable palette is reflective. Exposed soffits instead of absorbent ceiling tiles, glazed partitions instead of solid walls, hard flooring instead of carpet, and minimal soft furnishing. Each is a legitimate design choice, but together they remove almost every absorbent surface from the room, and the result is a space that measures fine for light and air and is tiring to work in.

No — it depends on the use. A space with very little reverberation can feel dead and unnatural, and speech can sound flat. Offices and meeting rooms want it short enough that speech stays clear and noise does not build up. Spaces intended for music want considerably longer. The target belongs to the room's purpose and should be set by the acoustic design.

The ceiling, almost always, because it is the largest uninterrupted surface and it faces every occupant. An absorbent ceiling does more than any other single intervention. After that, the floor finish — carpet in open-plan working areas — then wall treatment at the reflective surfaces facing each other.

Partly. In open plan the more useful measures relate to how far speech remains intelligible across the floor, which ISO 3382-3 addresses. Reverberation contributes, but distraction distance and speech decay describe the open-plan problem better. In enclosed rooms, reverberation time is the more direct measure.

Yes. It is calculated from room volume and the absorption of the proposed surfaces, using absorption data measured under ISO 354. That means the problem is visible at design stage on a spreadsheet, which is far cheaper than discovering it after occupation and retro-fitting panels.

Related

More in Glossary

All Glossary →

Planning an office or commercial project?

Tell us what you are planning. Message our team on WhatsApp, call us, or leave your number and we will call you back.

Request a callback